Notes from a commute|
One small note, not to tread on toes: eating meat may be inherently unhealthy for some humans but is not inherently unhealthy for Humanity, within limits. Smoking is inherently unhealthy for Humanity regardless of limits.
You could also say that being outside downtown is inherently unhealthy, what with all the crap in the air. Or using a computer, or any of tons of aspects of everyday life that have some sort of deleterious effect on some aspect of our health, despite the benefits they may offer.
I agree with you that smoking doesn't have much of anything in the way of benefits.
I still maintain that having some unhealthy habits, whether they are "inherently" so or otherwise, does not inherently make a person unhealthy overall.
I suppose the real question here is how one defines "healthy". Clearly the people conducting the study are doing so in a way that can include smokers.
Absolutely no argument on any of the above - see, I told you it wasn't to step on toes :-)
The range of what's healthy for who is astounding. Some people shouldn't eat meat, some people should. Some people should avoid starches, others need it like lifesblood. Some people die when looked at crosswise by a product that has semi-real peanut products.
Living is inherently hazardous to your health. The real question is the tradeoffs you make and the choices behind them. I respect conscious choices greatly. *poke poke* not that I know anybody like that ;) (kidding!) *poke*